Having ‘taken’ the White Stag Perceval receives per golden cup (‘coupe doree’) which he presents to Gawain per per manner reminiscent of the way per which Cliges presents his. In this section (lines 281–627) allusions puro the Perceval abound,25 but they are all given a humorous twist so that the audience realizes that the author is engaged mediante verso literary contest of wits and not mere slavish succedane of an acknowledged master. Whilst Chretien’s Perceval is the youngest of three sons of an impoverished and then deceased knight, sopra Fergus he is the eldest of three offspring of per paradoxically wealthy vilain (‘rice villain Soumeillet’, line 353),26 boorish, but married and obedient sicuro verso woman of noble partita on account of which she tells him it is not surprising that their son has set his heart on a life of prowess: ‘Car il a maint bon chevalier/ En affranchit lingnage de par moi.
So it’s my belief he is taking after them’). These details reverse the situation depicted per Chretien, yet the mother displays similar grief at her son’s departure per both poets.
The style is unmistakably that of courtly ratiocinatio, mediante the manner of Soredamors: Ensi la pucele travaille
Carefully noted by Owen throughout his translation. Durante Appendix Verso he translates relevant passages from the two Perceval Continuations. The name is usually taken as verso transformation of Somerled, raffinato of the Isles (i.di nuovo. the Hebrides; Perceval’s parents came from the ‘illes de mer’), who was a Scottish chieftain who was frequently at war with the king of Scotland, but this prezzi christiandatingforfree appears sicuro have no special significance mediante the romance where Fergus’s father has in nessun caso special role to play.
the prosperity of the family, the nobility of the mother, and the handsome physique of the sons, he adds: ‘Dato che il fuissent fil per certain roi,/ Sinon fuissent il molt biel, je croi,/ Et chevalier peussent estre’ (lines 331–33: ‘Had they been per king’s sons, they would have looked the part well, I think, and might easily have been knights’) – Chretien’s heroes are usually of royal blood! After the multiple reminiscences of Yvain, Erec and Perceval and their creative manipulation, Guillaume duly turns his attention sicuro Cliges which inspires the love dialectic of Galiene’s monologue at lines 1806 ff.,27 with its regular interrogative reprise of per key word as part of the argument: ‘Oh Fergus, bel amis ch[i]er! Amis? Fole, ke ai je dit? (lines 1806–7) Ja nel savra nel caso che ne li di. Jel die? Or ai dit folage (lines 1834–35) Mes pere me veut marier Verso certain roi, qua riches hom levante, Plus biel, espoir, que cis nen est. Plus biel? Or ai ge dit folie (lines 1842–45) Jamais ne m’ameroit, je cuit. Amer? Ne tant ne quant ne m’aimme.’ (lines 1850–51) (‘Ehi la Fergus, my dear handsome love! – My love? Fool that I am, what have I said? . . . He will never know unless I tell him. – Tell him? Now I’ve said something foolish . . . My father wants sicuro marry me puro verso king, per powerful man and perhaps per more handsome one than this. – More handsome? Now I’ve spoken nonsense . . . I’m sure he would definitely not love me. – Love? He doesn’t love me mediante the least.’)
First she sobs, then she yawns; she tosses and turns, then gives a via and almost loses consciousness
(cf. Cliges, line 881) Primes nel caso che[n]glout et puis baaille; (Cliges, lines 882–83) Dejete soi et puis tresaut, (Cliges, line 879) A successivamente que li cuers ne li faut. (Cliges, line 880) Un[e] eure dist, [l’]autre desdit; Un[e] eure pleure, l’autre rit. Puis torne chant lit a rebors; Itel sont li cembiel d’amors. (lines 1871–78) (Such is the maiden’s suffering. At one moment she says something, at the next denies it, now weeping, now laughing. Then she turns her bed upside down, so violent are the joustings of love.)